ALSTON AVE WIDENING

Alston_Wide.jpeg


I went to the public hearing last night for the planned widening of Alston Avenue (NC 55) through downtown. (From the Durham Freeway to Holloway). Public presence at the informal and formal sessions was scant - approximately 10 citizens. I spoke, as did Tom Davis of the The Community Builders, which is the lead organization on the HOPE VI project.

Key aspects of the project as currently designed:
1) Project is to be widened to 4 through lanes from NC147 to Holloway (NC98).

2) Left through lane 11 feet.

3) Right lane 14 ft (to accommodate bicylcists) but not striped for bikes.

4) Intersections may be as wide as 6 lanes due to dedicated turn lanes with wide turning radii.

5) Grass 16 ft. median.

6) 5 ft sidewalks with 4 ft grass planting strip (between sidewalk and road).

7) One way streets in the Golden Belt Historic District, creation of a cul-de-sac at the current intersection of Wall and Alston and another at Eva and Alston.

Key points that I advocated for, as guided by the institute for transportation Engineers Context-Sensitive design manual:

1) Sidewalks should be a minimum of 6 feet, preferably 8 ft in width. 5 ft is the absolute minimum for non-commercial areas, and does not allow comfortable side-by-side passage of pedestrians.

2) Left lane should be no wider than 10 feet, the minimum design recommendation by ITE. Wider lanes increase capacity minimally, and the right lane is appropriately wide to accommodate trucks and buses.

3) Dedicated right turn lanes are superfluous and have a major adverse impact on pedestrians at intersections, particularly when combined with wide turning radii (which allow cars to make right turns at higher speeds). Consolidate right turn lanes with right through lanes.

4) Reduce curb radii, as noted above.

5) Allow adequate planting strip and median width to allow planting of minimum 4 inch diameter street trees. Allocate necessary funds from the $175,000 landscaping budget to plant these trees. Street trees will provide a functional pedestrian buffer (which grass does not, particularly at less-than the recommended 6 ft width).

6) Cul-de-sacs are not recommended urban design and should be eliminated at Eva and Wall.

7) Stripe bike lane - a 14 ft unstriped width will increase effective traffic speeds, making biking inherently less safe.

I've scanned in some of the intersections so you can see the plan.
Alston_Main.jpeg


Current right-of-way is in black, proposed in red. Notice the very wide turning radius at the northwest corner of Main and Alston - 4 lanes southbound traffic at this intersection.

Alston_GB.jpeg

Alston through the Golden Belt National Register Historic District. The DOT requirement to avoid damaging properties has constrained the widening more in this section, as you can tell by the tighter curves. DOT has therefore made all of these streets one-way, and closed Wall Street on the East side (see red line/yellow Right-of-Way on Wall). Eastway elementary is at the northeast corner.

Alston_Holloway.jpeg

From Eastway to project end at Holloway. Notice the size of the intersections at Holloway and Liberty - very large turning radii with dedicated right turn lanes. Picture the speed of the cars whipping around these curves as people walk from the neighborhood on the west side of Alston to the park, school, etc. Notice the cul-de-sac on the west side of Alston at Eva.

If you want to comment on the project, the comment period is still open. Please email both:

Kimberly Hinton
khinton@dot.state.nc.us

and

Mark Ahrendsen
mark.ahrendsen@durhamnc.gov

with your comments. If you agree with my recommendations above, feel free to copy them verbatim.

Comments

I agree with you completely on all points. Of particular interst is the bike lane lack of definition. If the lane is imaginary, I suppose one could walk their sheep there or perhaps stroll a baby. It's the AnyLane.

Rob and I were just discussing how we feel like potential roadkill biking down Main Street. We were wondering about the posibility of a dirt trail on that strip next to Main, by the railroad tracks.

In any case, great work here...thank you for the contact info, I will be providing feedback.

Good points. I'd like to add that the pending Durham Bike Plan prescribes bike lanes for this corridor. As you may know, the pending Bike Plan is going to the city & county for approval this month (November). In addition to commenting on the Alston project, I'd like to ask your readers to write letters of support for the Bike Plan. May I post a website link in this comment section where folks can learn more about the Plan?

Dan

Feel free to post the link. In speaking with the tranportation people at the public meeting, it sounded as if they were throwing a half-hearted bone to the bicyclists with the 14 ft. lane width on the right. It wasn't completely clear, but it sounded like they wouldn't stripe it unless there was a minimum of 15 ft (12 ft vehicular). Hopefully, if they take the suggestion to drop the left lane to 10 ft, they will be able to accommodate this.

GK

Thanks for posting the email addresses and your educated points. I added to the points with my concerns of losing the corner grocery and its cool mural, increased car-vs-bike events, pushing east durham even farther away from downtown when they should be building connections between the east durham historic architecture and future restored goldenbelt. I haven't seen sheep on the roads around here, but horses have trotted by. They need protection like the bikers too!

Thanks.

For all interested in a more bike-friendly Durham, please support the Durham Bike Plan. You can read about it here http://www.bikewalkdurham.org/
(scroll down to Support Bike Plan if it's not at the top). The county is supposed to vote on it on the 13th, the city on the 20th.

For your reference, here is the DurhamWalks Pedestrian Plan, which was adopted in September.
http://www.durhamnc.gov/durhamwalks/final_plan.cfm

I finally got around to submitting my comment. In addition to copying and pasting your recommendations, I added this:

- Preferably, the 16-foot planted median should be eliminated in favor of a wider sidewalk and street trees on both sides of the street. Additionally, in areas with commercial frontage to the street as well as areas near Eastway Elementary and other areas requiring parking, Alston should have on-street parallel parking on both sides of the street. (The loss of central median will help this.) The median only encourages increased and unsafe speeds through a busy residential and commercial area. I realize that Alston constitutes a major throughway, but as it passes through the middle of a city, it must also serve as a pedestrian corridor and a commercial district.

Thanks Michael

I think your suggestion is an equally good option, although in that scenario I would advocate for a reduced, not eliminated median - keeping a minimum 6-8 foot median provides a good pedestrian refuge in large intersections (which are going to be a minimum of 5 lanes wide.

Appreciate the mention on ABCD.

GK

Add new comment

Log in or register to post comments.