905 CLEVELAND

905cleveland1980.jpeg905cleveland2006.jpeg

905 CLEVELAND

905
,
Durham
NC
Built in
1900
/ Demolished in
1980s
Architectural style: 
Construction type: 
Local historic district: 
National Register: 
Neighborhood: 
Type: 
Use: 

Comments

  • Submitted by Christopher on Wednesday, December 2, 2009 - 9:17pm

    Not the worst house I've ever seen, but it really doesn't fit in with the rest of the houses on the block--I do wonder how that got approved by the commission. And it pales in comparison to what preceded it. Though a house is indeed preferable to a vacant lot, as you said.

    I wonder why, and when, the original house was demolished.

Add new comment

In tours

  • This building does not appear in any tours yet.

Last updated

  • Mon, 07/11/2011 - 9:44pm by gary

Location

35° 59' 59.7804" N, 78° 53' 43.6344" W

Comments

905
,
Durham
NC
Built in
1900
/ Demolished in
1980s
Architectural style: 
Construction type: 
Local historic district: 
National Register: 
Neighborhood: 
Type: 
Use: 

 

Name: Hackney House
Built: ~1900
Demolished: Between 1980 and 1994

905cleveland1980.jpeg

Close to Little Five Points, the Hackney House was the home of Robert P Hackney, who owned the "Durham Seed House" on West Parrish Street. The corner tower was a not-uncommon feature on these large houses, although few survive.
The house was demolished sometime between 1980 and 1994.

The land sat vacant until recently, when a new house was built on the vacant lot. Since this is a local historic district, plans for this house must have passed muster with the city Historic Preservation Commission. I'm glad it has a house on it instead of remaining a vacant lot, but it looks like suburbia with some awkward I-don't-really-want-to-add-this elements to me. The current building is owned by a California landlord.

905cleveland2006.jpeg

Comments

Not the worst house I've ever seen, but it really doesn't fit in with the rest of the houses on the block--I do wonder how that got approved by the commission. And it pales in comparison to what preceded it. Though a house is indeed preferable to a vacant lot, as you said.

I wonder why, and when, the original house was demolished.

Add new comment