Support OpenDurham.org
Preserve Durham's History with a Donation to Open Durham Today!
OpenDurham.org is dedicated to preserving and sharing the rich history of our community. Run by our parent nonprofit, Preservation Durham, the site requires routine maintence and upgrades. We do not ask for support often, but today, we're asking you to chip in to help us reach our goal of raising $7,500 for annual maintenance by the end of the year. Your support allows us to maintain this valuable resource, expand our archives, and keep the history of Durham accessible to everyone.
Every contribution, big or small, makes a difference. Help us keep Durham's history alive for future generations.
Comments
Submitted by Binge Cafe (not verified) on Sat, 11/4/2006 - 4:29am
I agree with you completely on all points. Of particular interst is the bike lane lack of definition. If the lane is imaginary, I suppose one could walk their sheep there or perhaps stroll a baby. It's the AnyLane.
Rob and I were just discussing how we feel like potential roadkill biking down Main Street. We were wondering about the posibility of a dirt trail on that strip next to Main, by the railroad tracks.
In any case, great work here...thank you for the contact info, I will be providing feedback.
Submitted by Dan Clever (not verified) on Sun, 11/5/2006 - 6:31pm
Good points. I'd like to add that the pending Durham Bike Plan prescribes bike lanes for this corridor. As you may know, the pending Bike Plan is going to the city & county for approval this month (November). In addition to commenting on the Alston project, I'd like to ask your readers to write letters of support for the Bike Plan. May I post a website link in this comment section where folks can learn more about the Plan?
Submitted by Sven (not verified) on Sun, 11/5/2006 - 6:49pm
Dan
Feel free to post the link. In speaking with the tranportation people at the public meeting, it sounded as if they were throwing a half-hearted bone to the bicyclists with the 14 ft. lane width on the right. It wasn't completely clear, but it sounded like they wouldn't stripe it unless there was a minimum of 15 ft (12 ft vehicular). Hopefully, if they take the suggestion to drop the left lane to 10 ft, they will be able to accommodate this.
GK
Submitted by coco (not verified) on Sun, 11/5/2006 - 8:59pm
Thanks for posting the email addresses and your educated points. I added to the points with my concerns of losing the corner grocery and its cool mural, increased car-vs-bike events, pushing east durham even farther away from downtown when they should be building connections between the east durham historic architecture and future restored goldenbelt. I haven't seen sheep on the roads around here, but horses have trotted by. They need protection like the bikers too!
Submitted by Dan Clever (not verified) on Sun, 11/5/2006 - 10:39pm
Thanks.
For all interested in a more bike-friendly Durham, please support the Durham Bike Plan. You can read about it here http://www.bikewalkdurham.org/
(scroll down to Support Bike Plan if it's not at the top). The county is supposed to vote on it on the 13th, the city on the 20th.
For your reference, here is the DurhamWalks Pedestrian Plan, which was adopted in September.
http://www.durhamnc.gov/durhamwalks/final_plan.cfm
Submitted by Michael (not verified) on Fri, 11/10/2006 - 4:17am
I finally got around to submitting my comment. In addition to copying and pasting your recommendations, I added this:
- Preferably, the 16-foot planted median should be eliminated in favor of a wider sidewalk and street trees on both sides of the street. Additionally, in areas with commercial frontage to the street as well as areas near Eastway Elementary and other areas requiring parking, Alston should have on-street parallel parking on both sides of the street. (The loss of central median will help this.) The median only encourages increased and unsafe speeds through a busy residential and commercial area. I realize that Alston constitutes a major throughway, but as it passes through the middle of a city, it must also serve as a pedestrian corridor and a commercial district.
Submitted by Sven (not verified) on Fri, 11/10/2006 - 2:28pm
Thanks Michael
I think your suggestion is an equally good option, although in that scenario I would advocate for a reduced, not eliminated median - keeping a minimum 6-8 foot median provides a good pedestrian refuge in large intersections (which are going to be a minimum of 5 lanes wide.
Appreciate the mention on ABCD.
GK
Add new comment
Log in or register to post comments.