THE RESTOVER / CC WOODS HOUSE
Comments
(Courtesy Jon and Shannon Thornburg)
Carl C. Woods, a general contractor later known simply as "CC Woods" built the large house at 217 West Geer St. around 1939-1940. It evidently served solely as the primary residence for him and his wife until about 1948, when they opened a 'tourist hotel' (a bed-and-breakfast of sorts) in their home. The obverse side of the above postcard reads:
"Private or Connecting Baths and Showers, Steam heat, Beauty Sleep Mattresses. The Restover - Tourist
Mrs. CC Woods
217 W Geer Street
Running Water in Rooms
US Highway 15 and 501
Durham NC"
The Woods evidently lived in the house and ran the Restover until 1959, when it appears they moved elsewhere, and the house became an apartment building. It appears that it has been such ever since, albeit in ever-declining form as the neighborhood fell on increasingly harder times. Most recently, it appears to have suffered from a bad case of off-the-rack-window home depotitis. If the window doesn't fit, just shrink the opening.
217 West Geer, 07.24.08
The house was purchased by CASA in 2010 and is being renovated as apartments
04.17.11
36.003682 -78.897471
Comments
Wow, but those two trees have
Wow, but those two trees have grown!
Before he simply became a
Before he simply became a name on cake mixes, Duncan Hines published travel guides called "Adventures in Good Eating" and "Lodging for a Night." When I was a kid, my mother used to swear by his recommendations.
Anyway, I still have a 1947 copy of "Lodging for a Night," and it mentions the Restover. Here's what he says:
"Guest House: Restover. 217 W. Greer (sic) St. Open all year. This beautiful old (sic) Colonial house has 14 rms nicely furnished. For 2, $2.00-$3.00."
Just as a point of comparison, the Washington Duke was also recommended ("thoroughly modern in every detail") and charged "$4.00 up."
So it obviously became a tourist home before 1947. I wonder if they built it with that in mind? Or, since Duncan Hines called it "old", I wonder if they simply greatly expanded an existing structure? Do you happen to know what was on that site earlier?
What has happened to it is awful.
JohnThank you! I've read
John
Thank you! I've read about those guides, but I've never seen one. I researched this by going through each city directory. The first one that I found the Restover listed in was 1948. There was nothing on the lot in 1937, and the address 217/ CC Woods doesn't appear in the city directory until 1939-1940. I think Mr. Hines just assumed that it wss more colonial than colonial revival.
GK
Isn't the for sale sign still
Isn't the for sale sign still in front of the house? I don't see it in the picture. It has been on the market for months.
I know El Kilombo was trying to raise money to buy this house to have a permanent location.
AnonI think I did see a "For
Anon
I think I did see a "For Sale" sign, but I couldn't find a listing online.
GK
anonymous is correct, the
anonymous is correct, the home is listed by America's Best Realty for $235,000:
Property being Sold 'AS IS'. This is a 6 unit multi family building. A lot of renovations have taken place already. New AC units, windows, ceramic tiles, wiring, etc. Building comprised of 1 to 3 bedroom units. Must see, great for an investor to complete the renovation work. Three story building with a basement.
ListHub shows an asking price of $199,500:
Well, isn't that a bargain!
Well, isn't that a bargain! According to the tax records, the current owners, who are from Texas, bought the building in May,2007 for $58,526. Now, after remuddling it, they'll let you have it for only 199,500.
Don't we have enough of these local vandals without importing them from f**kin' Texas as well?
yeah, those trees are amazing
yeah, those trees are amazing
the window thing drives me
the window thing drives me insane! how can they even get away with that and call it a renovation? and ask a price for it!? bah.
TSQ75
John Martin, I have no idea
John Martin, I have no idea why SJM Properties would target buying THIS property in THIS city. It does seem strange...they don't show up as owners of record on any other Durham property, and more interestingly, they don't show up as owners of any property in Dallas (Dallas County) nor the sister city of Fort Worth (Tarrant County). Search parameters used were "SJM Properties" and "SJM Properties LLC".
Slumlord real-estate speculating is a long-standing Durham tradition. I see not much has changed. *sigh*
Recognize that you're blessed to have community members who care what happens, and be thankful that you're not out here living in *ahem* "f**kin' Texas". It's worse than you can possibly imagine. :)
A renovation can (and often
A renovation can (and often does) include bad additions, undersized cheap windows, gutting original trim, etc. and etc.
A restoration, however, is when you [are supposed to] "do it right."
Some knuckleheads, however, like to use the term restoration when they really mean renovation.
This is so sad to look at
This is so sad to look at this house. What a grand house that has been carved up, and architecturally "f'd up" with its pathetic attempt to renovate. Those windows themselves are enough to make me not even want to look at the place. Again and again, the attempt to get the absolute most financially out of, by doing everything on the absolute cheap seems to rule. Quality workmanship, and a concern for your community and the structure itself gets thrown out when a property pimp like SJM's gotta make that buck...
Myers
The green spray painted house
The green spray painted house numbers are a wonderful finishing touch.
It actually went through a
It actually went through a foreclosure a year or two ago. SJM was the lender and took it back.
Are those two 'sticks' in the
Are those two 'sticks' in the old picture those grand trees that stand today? What an awesome sight!
The "rennovation" leaves much to be desired. Ugh. Out of state investors. What do you expect?
During the "City Hall this
During the "City Hall this Week" program on TV it was mentioned that the city has obtained $2.1 million in stimulus dollars to stabilize struggling neighborhoods. Included among these are the many multi-unit buildings on W. Geer, and 217 W. Geer was specifically called out. Apparently the building will be repaired (renovated? restored?) for use by a group called CASA.
I was unable to find a video archive of this weeks program, but some info is on the City's web site.
I was looking back at this
I was looking back at this post. Haven't seen any action occurring at The Restover. I found the link to the City Hall This Week episode from June 16 here:
http://durham.granicus.com/ASX.php?publish_id=65&sn=durham.granicus.com
This house is for sale by
This house is for sale by owner (the lender who foreclosed on it), The owner can be reached joez@rockstone.com, seller can pay a referral or finder fee of 3%
Comments
Wow, but those two trees have grown!
Before he simply became a name on cake mixes, Duncan Hines published travel guides called "Adventures in Good Eating" and "Lodging for a Night." When I was a kid, my mother used to swear by his recommendations.
Anyway, I still have a 1947 copy of "Lodging for a Night," and it mentions the Restover. Here's what he says:
"Guest House: Restover. 217 W. Greer (sic) St. Open all year. This beautiful old (sic) Colonial house has 14 rms nicely furnished. For 2, $2.00-$3.00."
Just as a point of comparison, the Washington Duke was also recommended ("thoroughly modern in every detail") and charged "$4.00 up."
So it obviously became a tourist home before 1947. I wonder if they built it with that in mind? Or, since Duncan Hines called it "old", I wonder if they simply greatly expanded an existing structure? Do you happen to know what was on that site earlier?
What has happened to it is awful.
John
Thank you! I've read about those guides, but I've never seen one. I researched this by going through each city directory. The first one that I found the Restover listed in was 1948. There was nothing on the lot in 1937, and the address 217/ CC Woods doesn't appear in the city directory until 1939-1940. I think Mr. Hines just assumed that it wss more colonial than colonial revival.
GK
Isn't the for sale sign still in front of the house? I don't see it in the picture. It has been on the market for months.
I know El Kilombo was trying to raise money to buy this house to have a permanent location.
Anon
I think I did see a "For Sale" sign, but I couldn't find a listing online.
GK
anonymous is correct, the home is listed by America's Best Realty for $235,000:
217 West Geer
Property being Sold 'AS IS'. This is a 6 unit multi family building. A lot of renovations have taken place already. New AC units, windows, ceramic tiles, wiring, etc. Building comprised of 1 to 3 bedroom units. Must see, great for an investor to complete the renovation work. Three story building with a basement.
ListHub shows an asking price of $199,500:
ListHub - 217 W Geer Street, Durham, NC, 27701
Well, isn't that a bargain! According to the tax records, the current owners, who are from Texas, bought the building in May,2007 for $58,526. Now, after remuddling it, they'll let you have it for only 199,500.
Don't we have enough of these local vandals without importing them from f**kin' Texas as well?
yeah, those trees are amazing
the window thing drives me insane! how can they even get away with that and call it a renovation? and ask a price for it!? bah.
TSQ75
John Martin, I have no idea why SJM Properties would target buying THIS property in THIS city. It does seem strange...they don't show up as owners of record on any other Durham property, and more interestingly, they don't show up as owners of any property in Dallas (Dallas County) nor the sister city of Fort Worth (Tarrant County). Search parameters used were "SJM Properties" and "SJM Properties LLC".
Slumlord real-estate speculating is a long-standing Durham tradition. I see not much has changed. *sigh*
Recognize that you're blessed to have community members who care what happens, and be thankful that you're not out here living in *ahem* "f**kin' Texas". It's worse than you can possibly imagine. :)
A renovation can (and often does) include bad additions, undersized cheap windows, gutting original trim, etc. and etc.
A restoration, however, is when you [are supposed to] "do it right."
Some knuckleheads, however, like to use the term restoration when they really mean renovation.
This is so sad to look at this house. What a grand house that has been carved up, and architecturally "f'd up" with its pathetic attempt to renovate. Those windows themselves are enough to make me not even want to look at the place. Again and again, the attempt to get the absolute most financially out of, by doing everything on the absolute cheap seems to rule. Quality workmanship, and a concern for your community and the structure itself gets thrown out when a property pimp like SJM's gotta make that buck...
Myers
The green spray painted house numbers are a wonderful finishing touch.
It actually went through a foreclosure a year or two ago. SJM was the lender and took it back.
Are those two 'sticks' in the old picture those grand trees that stand today? What an awesome sight!
The "rennovation" leaves much to be desired. Ugh. Out of state investors. What do you expect?
During the "City Hall this Week" program on TV it was mentioned that the city has obtained $2.1 million in stimulus dollars to stabilize struggling neighborhoods. Included among these are the many multi-unit buildings on W. Geer, and 217 W. Geer was specifically called out. Apparently the building will be repaired (renovated? restored?) for use by a group called CASA.
I was unable to find a video archive of this weeks program, but some info is on the City's web site.
I was looking back at this post. Haven't seen any action occurring at The Restover. I found the link to the City Hall This Week episode from June 16 here:
http://durham.granicus.com/ASX.php?publish_id=65&sn=durham.granicus.com
This house is for sale by owner (the lender who foreclosed on it), The owner can be reached joez@rockstone.com, seller can pay a referral or finder fee of 3%
Just in case the reverse of the postcard isn't in your files. Found on Ancestry.com in its postcard records.
Add new comment