Support OpenDurham.org
Preserve Durham's History with a Donation to Open Durham Today!
OpenDurham.org is dedicated to preserving and sharing the rich history of our community. Run by our parent nonprofit, Preservation Durham, the site requires routine maintence and upgrades. We do not ask for support often, but today, we're asking you to chip in to help us reach our goal of raising $7,500 for annual maintenance by the end of the year. Your support allows us to maintain this valuable resource, expand our archives, and keep the history of Durham accessible to everyone.
Every contribution, big or small, makes a difference. Help us keep Durham's history alive for future generations.
Comments
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 10/28/2009 - 1:23pm
I like the replacement windows better but miss the double glass doors at the front. I guess the house immediately to the left in the first picture is gone now, because that's not the Marie Austin building.
Submitted by Erik (not verified) on Wed, 10/28/2009 - 4:51pm
The building also appears to host some sort of church gathering on the weekends.
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 10/28/2009 - 6:25pm
@Erik:
Jesus City Church (RCCG)
(in basement)
Submitted by Kevin Hartzog (not verified) on Wed, 10/28/2009 - 7:06pm
I miss the aluminum awning windows. I know they don't open or insulate well after awhile, but they were the deal in the semi-air-conditioned buildings of the 1950's. I am guessing the double doors were replaced with a large single door so a wheelchair or stretcher could get in without opening both doors. Frameless glass doors are pretty but can be drafty without a vestibule.
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 10/28/2009 - 7:20pm
To me the most interesting part of any of the photos is not the Professional Building, but what is that on top of the house in the first (May 1938) photo? Too big to be a bird or lightning rod, methinks.
Submitted by Lynn (not verified) on Thu, 10/29/2009 - 1:05am
Anon, you're seeing the dangling street light. The angle makes it appear to be perched upon the top of the house in the background. Look at the photo in the post below this one -- you'll see same light from a different angle.
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 10/29/2009 - 1:24pm
Boy, do I feel silly! I really thought it was a decorative roof ornament of some kind. Thanks for figuring this out, Lynn!
Submitted by RWE (not verified) on Thu, 10/29/2009 - 2:30pm
This is one of my favorite commercial buildings in Durham. When it was renovated a few years ago, the owner wanted to cover the brick with stucco. The Historic Preservation Commission denied that request, but did approve demolition of the (drastically altered) structure immediately to the north.
Submitted by JMeade (not verified) on Mon, 7/25/2011 - 2:00am
My Dentist, Dr. Kanoy, was located on the second floor of the professional building until moving up the street in the early 70's
Submitted by Bill (not verified) on Mon, 10/17/2011 - 9:55am
The house immediately to the left of the Professional Building was 1202 Broad Street and my family rented the upstairs apartment when I was a very young child which would have been about 1948 thru 1950. I would walk across the street to Hospital Pharmacy and have Dr. Spencer or his wife mix me a Coca Cola at their soda fountain and they also had a refrigerated Whitman's candy display since air conditioning was non existant at that time. After that, we moved to 1314 Broad Street, the block that also was the block that had Bolinger's Boarding house.
Submitted by Joseph Sparks on Thu, 10/30/2014 - 4:40pm
While I have long forgotten his name, the surgeon who removed my appendix in 1969 at Watts Hospital had his office in this building. We lived right behind it at 1200 then 1202 Clarendon Street for a while. Both houses long gone now.
Submitted by rtk on Tue, 2/14/2017 - 6:01pm
In reply to While I have long forgotten by Joseph Sparks
The surgeon may have been Dr. H. Max Schiebel. He most likely had an office there.
Submitted by Ben on Tue, 2/28/2017 - 11:20pm
In reply to The surgeon may have been Dr. by rtk
Thanks for the comment, rtk!
Add new comment
Log in or register to post comments.