FIRE STATION #2

/sites/default/files/images/2006_10/FireStation2_HandSrendering_1902.jpgFireSt2_2_1910.jpegFireSt2_1910.jpeg/sites/default/files/images/2006_10/cobb_obrien_fs2_1910s.jpg/sites/default/files/images/2006_10/Liggett_NW_1920s.jpg

FIRE STATION #2

612
,
Durham
NC
Built in
1902
/ Demolished in
1951
Builders: 
Architectural style: 
Construction type: 
Neighborhood: 
Type: 
Use: 

Comments

  • Submitted by David E. Felton on Monday, October 30, 2006 - 3:27pm

    Hello, My name is David Felton and I just wanted to let you know that I love your web log. My Mom is from Durham and both sides of her family go way back in the area. I grew up visiting Durham multiple times every year to see my grandparents. Now I have lived in Durham for the better part of the last eleven years. Via local blogger Joe Vilas I got turned on to your efforts here. You are doing an amazing thing and I for one am immensely grateful to you for your efforts and for helping me and all who visit here to learn more about the Durham of yesterday, today and tomorrow. I can't say enough about how impressed and inspired I am by the amount of work you are doing on this project. Keep up the great work. Cheers.

  • Submitted by Sven on Monday, October 30, 2006 - 3:48pm

    David

    Thanks so much for your positive feedback - you made my morning. I hope it continues to earn your high praise.

    If you or your family have any stories to add to specific places featured on the blog or any old photos of Durham, I'd love to highlight them.

    Thanks again.

    GK

  • Submitted by Anonymous on Tuesday, October 31, 2006 - 12:11am

    Hello! I want to thank you for the amazing work you're doing on this blog. I have been looking for this type of historical insight for years and you have done a better job putting a face on historic Durham than just about any other source. I don't always agree with your conclusions about the best plan for specific locations, but I completely respect the heart and hard work you are obviously putting into this effort. Thank you very much!

  • Submitted by Sven on Tuesday, October 31, 2006 - 1:23am

    Anonymous

    Thanks for the positive feedback - I'm glad you've found it interesting/useful despite sometimes disagreeing. That's exactly what I would hope for.

    GK

  • Submitted by Joe on Tuesday, October 31, 2006 - 6:17pm

    Do you know if this fire station had a definable architectural style? Except for the brick (which I understand in context), it looks kinda like Mission style. Or maybe it's just the little-known Durham Catholic-Church Brick Fire-Station Motif. :)

    Another neat post. Thank you. I had no idea.

  • Submitted by Sven on Tuesday, October 31, 2006 - 6:57pm

    Joe

    I agree with you that it has some strong Mission-style elements, although it almost seems like a cross between that and Richardsonian Romanesque. I guess fire stations had a fair bit of latitude (I'll do Station One at some point). I think DCCBFSM is a good description, although something catchier might be in order...

    GK

  • Submitted by Joe on Wednesday, November 1, 2006 - 2:24am

    Those round, stout arches are indeed reminiscent of Richardsonian Romanesque. I saw several of those in the Boston area on a trip a few years ago, and I like them a lot.

    I happened to be walking down Main Street today, and altered my path a little to pass directly by the previous location of this building. The demolition crew has moved into the two adjoining buildings, and is doing things like knocking out bricked-up windows and tearing out old infrastructure. And I'll swear to god that I smelled something I haven't smelled downtown in years: tobacco. Maybe some old dust was disturbed, or maybe it was my imagination, but I swear I smelled it. :)

  • Submitted by Sven on Wednesday, November 1, 2006 - 3:31am

    I loved that smell - used to smell it some mornings when the wind was blowing south (or something). Sweet, earthy smell.

    Read on your blog that you were in a wreck - hope you're doing okay.

    GK

  • Submitted by Joe on Wednesday, November 1, 2006 - 4:30am

    Thanks. I'm better, but not totally. Some people would say the brain damage was always there. ;) And I have no car, which is why I was walking down Main from the attorney's office. :/

    Leave a comment the next time you stop by. :)

  • Submitted by Chuck on Wednesday, March 28, 2007 - 2:56pm

    When I went to work with the fire department in May of 1951 the old station was gone and the new station on ninth street was occupied. Please note the two pictures showing the old factory across the street where two floors were taken off and the old factory still stands.

  • Submitted by Marsosudiro on Wednesday, March 17, 2010 - 3:25am

    That aerial photo from the 30s is amazing.

    As I've probably mentioned in other comments, I drive through Durham today with a pair of eyes that is much much different than the set I owned before I started reading this blog.

    In particular, I often fantasize about what I would (and ought) build if I had a magic wand to place new buildings where there are now vacant lots, parking lots, or ugly cheap things that could come down.

    My daily drive on Chapel Hill Rd. between the Lakewood Y and Morehead Ave. is the stretch where I do most of my thought experiments.

    I suspect that it wouldn't be appropriate or useful to re-build new homes or businesses in the exact shape of the best buildings that were there before -- but what could I build that would serve modern Durham well, while harmonizing with the space and with the best of what remains?

    I'd be glad to see an Endangered Durham blog on new infill construction (of the last twenty years, say) that you think works well.

  • Submitted by Carl on Friday, February 3, 2012 - 2:30pm

    Gary,

    I just noticed that the building across from the old station (605 W. Main St.), in the 5th photo down it shows that it once was a 4 story building. That is crazy! It is now just a two story building and it shows it in the 7th picture down. 605 is now apartments also and being with the Durham Fire Department I love going on here and looking at the history about all the buildings. Thanks for what you do and keep up the GREAT work!

    Carl Hamlin

  • Submitted by gary on Friday, February 3, 2012 - 3:50pm

    Carl - 

    Yes, it was 'shortened' in ~1949. That entry is here:

    http://www.opendurham.org/buildings/duke-factory-old-cigarette-factory?full

     

    So glad you enjoy the site!

    Gary

  • Submitted by Durhamite on Tuesday, February 11, 2014 - 11:24pm

    Raised in Durham, graduated from DHS (Go Bulldogs!) and I specifically remember that rich, fermented tobacco aroma; spicy and pungent while sitting in class. It was especially noticeable during the increasing heat and humidity of the spring. Remember that for most of the high school's history, ventilation was based on opening and closing those oversized window sashes. No air conditioning. Living in the Northgate Park/Bragtown area, the tobacco smell was not part of my neighborhood, so it was noticeable when we went downtown...even to dyed-in-the-cloth Durham residents.

  • Submitted by Tom Fowler on Thursday, May 29, 2014 - 10:28pm

    As the fire dept historian I would like to share some facts about this building.

    The total cost of building this building in 1902 was $8,114. The contract price was $7,0750, due to architectural changes the cost was more.This was recorded from city records dated in June 1903, after the completion of the building, placing the construction in 1902-1903.
    Mr. N.Underwood was the building contractor.

Add new comment

In tours

Last updated

  • Wed, 04/17/2019 - 10:19am by gary

Location

35° 59' 55.4532" N, 78° 54' 24.534" W

Comments

612
,
Durham
NC
Built in
1902
/ Demolished in
1951
Builders: 
Architectural style: 
Construction type: 
Neighborhood: 
Type: 
Use: 

 

The original Fire Station #2 was constructed on the north side of West Main Street, across from the W. Duke & Sons cigarette factory between 1888 and 1893. The original building was a frame structure with a reservoir at the rear of the building. The building was located on Duke Co. land through a lease arrangement with the company, wherein the tobacco company built the structure. The Independent Hose Company #2, a group of volunteer firefighters who owned their own equipment (except for the hoses, which the city owned) manned the station, and Duke company provided $100 per month to feed the horses. The city agreed to buy a new truck and two horses, and employ a driver.

When the volunteer company was disbanded, Captain Bradsher of the fire department formed Hose Company #2, outfitted with new city-owned equipment, except for two horses (Frank and Ben) 'transferred' from the African-American hook and ladder company to company #2.

By 1902, the frame building was considered outmoded, and a new structure was commissioned. It was built in 1902-3, opening on August 3 , 1903; W. Duke and Sons contributed $4000 to its construction. It was designed by Charlotte architects Hook and Sawyer, who designed multiple early Durham structures. The station was the second brick fire station constructed, after the original fire station at N. Mangum and Holloway Sts.


Hook and Sawyer rendering of the fire station, 1902

The company posing in front of the building, 1910
FireSt2_2_1910.jpeg
(Courtesy Durham County Library)

FireSt2_1910.jpeg
Fire Station, ~1920s.
(Courtesy Durham County Library)


Fire Station #2 between the Cobb and O'Brien Warehouses, 1910s. This is one of the few pictures showing the Cobb warehouse prior to the addition of three upper floors to the building.
(Courtesy Durham County Library)

This view from the 1930s show the fire station tucked between the two warehouses located on the north side of Main street.

(Courtesy Durham County Library)

Here it can be seen, obliquely, at ground level during shift change at Liggett and Myers.
LM_Shift_FireSt2_FayettevilleBus_1920s.jpeg
(Courtesy Durham County Library)

And it was still standing post-1948, when the New Cigarette Factory was built (i.e. big blocky black-striped building).

(Courtesy Duke Archives)

Fire Station/Company 2 was relocated to a new station on Ninth Street in 1951, where it remains. The land, per the original lease agreement, reverted to the tobacco company.


Above, Fire Station #2 in 1951, as the company prepares to move to 9th St.
(Courtesy Barry Norman)


After the move to Ninth Street, 1951.
(Courtesy The Herald-Sun)

The building was torn down sometime soon thereafter, and the site became an empty courtyard between Liggett Buildings.

Here is the site prior to West Village phase 2 renovations, 2006.
FireSt2_2006.jpeg

And after renovations, 2008


Looking northwest, 05.25.08

I can understand why Liggett would have removed the fire station to have better access between their warehouse buildings, but what a shame - I love the similarities and contrast between the mission style fire station and the industrial Italianate warehouses around it.

Comments

Hello, My name is David Felton and I just wanted to let you know that I love your web log. My Mom is from Durham and both sides of her family go way back in the area. I grew up visiting Durham multiple times every year to see my grandparents. Now I have lived in Durham for the better part of the last eleven years. Via local blogger Joe Vilas I got turned on to your efforts here. You are doing an amazing thing and I for one am immensely grateful to you for your efforts and for helping me and all who visit here to learn more about the Durham of yesterday, today and tomorrow. I can't say enough about how impressed and inspired I am by the amount of work you are doing on this project. Keep up the great work. Cheers.

David

Thanks so much for your positive feedback - you made my morning. I hope it continues to earn your high praise.

If you or your family have any stories to add to specific places featured on the blog or any old photos of Durham, I'd love to highlight them.

Thanks again.

GK

Hello! I want to thank you for the amazing work you're doing on this blog. I have been looking for this type of historical insight for years and you have done a better job putting a face on historic Durham than just about any other source. I don't always agree with your conclusions about the best plan for specific locations, but I completely respect the heart and hard work you are obviously putting into this effort. Thank you very much!

Anonymous

Thanks for the positive feedback - I'm glad you've found it interesting/useful despite sometimes disagreeing. That's exactly what I would hope for.

GK

Do you know if this fire station had a definable architectural style? Except for the brick (which I understand in context), it looks kinda like Mission style. Or maybe it's just the little-known Durham Catholic-Church Brick Fire-Station Motif. :)

Another neat post. Thank you. I had no idea.

Joe

I agree with you that it has some strong Mission-style elements, although it almost seems like a cross between that and Richardsonian Romanesque. I guess fire stations had a fair bit of latitude (I'll do Station One at some point). I think DCCBFSM is a good description, although something catchier might be in order...

GK

Those round, stout arches are indeed reminiscent of Richardsonian Romanesque. I saw several of those in the Boston area on a trip a few years ago, and I like them a lot.

I happened to be walking down Main Street today, and altered my path a little to pass directly by the previous location of this building. The demolition crew has moved into the two adjoining buildings, and is doing things like knocking out bricked-up windows and tearing out old infrastructure. And I'll swear to god that I smelled something I haven't smelled downtown in years: tobacco. Maybe some old dust was disturbed, or maybe it was my imagination, but I swear I smelled it. :)

I loved that smell - used to smell it some mornings when the wind was blowing south (or something). Sweet, earthy smell.

Read on your blog that you were in a wreck - hope you're doing okay.

GK

Thanks. I'm better, but not totally. Some people would say the brain damage was always there. ;) And I have no car, which is why I was walking down Main from the attorney's office. :/

Leave a comment the next time you stop by. :)

When I went to work with the fire department in May of 1951 the old station was gone and the new station on ninth street was occupied. Please note the two pictures showing the old factory across the street where two floors were taken off and the old factory still stands.

That aerial photo from the 30s is amazing.

As I've probably mentioned in other comments, I drive through Durham today with a pair of eyes that is much much different than the set I owned before I started reading this blog.

In particular, I often fantasize about what I would (and ought) build if I had a magic wand to place new buildings where there are now vacant lots, parking lots, or ugly cheap things that could come down.

My daily drive on Chapel Hill Rd. between the Lakewood Y and Morehead Ave. is the stretch where I do most of my thought experiments.

I suspect that it wouldn't be appropriate or useful to re-build new homes or businesses in the exact shape of the best buildings that were there before -- but what could I build that would serve modern Durham well, while harmonizing with the space and with the best of what remains?

I'd be glad to see an Endangered Durham blog on new infill construction (of the last twenty years, say) that you think works well.

Gary,

I just noticed that the building across from the old station (605 W. Main St.), in the 5th photo down it shows that it once was a 4 story building. That is crazy! It is now just a two story building and it shows it in the 7th picture down. 605 is now apartments also and being with the Durham Fire Department I love going on here and looking at the history about all the buildings. Thanks for what you do and keep up the GREAT work!

Carl Hamlin

Carl - 

Yes, it was 'shortened' in ~1949. That entry is here:

http://www.opendurham.org/buildings/duke-factory-old-cigarette-factory?full

 

So glad you enjoy the site!

Gary

Raised in Durham, graduated from DHS (Go Bulldogs!) and I specifically remember that rich, fermented tobacco aroma; spicy and pungent while sitting in class. It was especially noticeable during the increasing heat and humidity of the spring. Remember that for most of the high school's history, ventilation was based on opening and closing those oversized window sashes. No air conditioning. Living in the Northgate Park/Bragtown area, the tobacco smell was not part of my neighborhood, so it was noticeable when we went downtown...even to dyed-in-the-cloth Durham residents.

As the fire dept historian I would like to share some facts about this building.

The total cost of building this building in 1902 was $8,114. The contract price was $7,0750, due to architectural changes the cost was more.This was recorded from city records dated in June 1903, after the completion of the building, placing the construction in 1902-1903.
Mr. N.Underwood was the building contractor.

Add new comment